|

|
 |
Excerpt from
Public Art in Stations:
Philadelphia and Cincinnati
Photographer, Photo Researcher, Writer:
Janet Greenstein Potter
Printed in Vintage Rails, No. 13, July/August 1998
6,000 words
Large
corporations today pump up their prestige by sponsoring sporting events and
spending millions of dollars on slick image-enhancement campaigns. In the
1930s, passenger-carrying railroads made powerhouse statements to their customers
through station architecture and, by extension, through public artthe
superscaled, dramatic murals and sculptures that railroads commissioned for
inside and outside their buildings.
Public art, by
the simplest definition, requires no admission charge and is accessible around
the clock. At its most sophisticated, public art expresses the aesthetic soul
of a nation. It
reflects an era's dominant social and cultural aspirations. When created for
a railroad station, public art blends artistry, craftsmanship, and historical
documentation with corporate horn-tooting.
During the first half of this century, most railroad travelers from small
towns had never visited an art museum or a state capitol nor worshipped at
a cathedral. Arriving at a big-city railway palace, they paused in startled
awe at the sight of a 100-foot-long mural or a monumental, 40-foot-high sculpture.
Yet many others treated art in railroad stations as anonymous, everyday stuff;
commuters and railroad employees routinely hurried past these masterpieces
in preoccupied oblivion.
People tour museum galleries deliberately to contemplate works of art. When
inside civic or religious buildings, they can use the slow-paced, ceremonial
atmosphere to savor the murals and stained-glass windows. But at a bustling
railroad station, only a delayed train or a missed connection gives travelers
the chance to focus extensively on a statue or a paintingto wonder what
inspired it, who commissioned it, who made it, and what gives it meaning.
Railroad executives influenced the nation's collective memory by using public
art to communicate a citizenship message or present the august image of a
hero (even if that hero was one of themselves). The subject matter was usually
commemorative and the artist's treatment often allegorical. Common themes
included western expansion, the chronology of transportation modes, industrial
and commercial progress, local history, and pivotal events in the patron railroad's
development.
In the 1930s and 1940s, as the Great Depression pummeled the nation and Europe
rumbled with war, railroads used art to conjure up a pure and noble American
past and find secure meaning in the "American way of life." At new stations
in Philadelphia and Cincinnati, they succeeded boldly, revealing surprising
flexibility, uncommon flamboyance, and a generosity of spirit.
30TH STREET
STATION, PHILADELPHIA
A Triumph in Plaster
In 1933, the Pennsylvania
Railroad opened a new flagship station in West Philadelphia. Officially designated
"Pennsylvania Station," it was soon known as "30th Street Station." This name
distinguished it from PRR's North Philadelphia Station and from the railroad's
famous Broad Street Station, then still in use across from City Hall, three-fourths
of a mile away.
Broad Street
Station was built in 1881 and substantially enlarged by architect Frank Furness
just 12 years later. It was encrusted with sculpture, inside and out. Above
the information booth was a high relief called the SPIRIT
OF TRANSPORTATION, completed in 1895 by 28-year-old Karl Bitter.
A deserter from the Austrian army, Bitter had arrived in the United States
six years before. He carried a portfolio illustrating his work and a pack heavy-laden
with sculpture tools. Within weeks he became the protégé of
world-class architect Richard Morris Hunt, who commissioned Bitter to sculpt
numerous works for the Biltmore Estate in Asheville, North Carolina. Hunt
also put Bitter in charge of the sculpture for two buildings at the 1893 World's
Columbian Exposition in Chicago, including the centerpiece Administration
Building.
As he
worked on subsequent world's fairs, Bitter insisted that sculpture should
relate intimately to the theme of each exposition, rather than being a collection
of miscellaneous decoration. He demonstrated a similar philosophy at Broad
Street Station, where, through stylized and allegorical sculpture, he presented
the size and complexity of the Pennsylvania Railroad system, while idealizing
its connection to art, industry, and science.
Bitter
wanted to avoid sculptural interpretations that were prosaic or too literal.
For Broad Street, he wrote of "a desire to …."
END OF
EXCERPT
|